Compare models
HEAD TO HEAD

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs GPT-6 Astra

Published test results, prices, limits and features, side by side. Share the link to show someone exactly this comparison.

At a glance

  • Capability index

    • Gemini 3.7 Flash157.3
    • GPT-6 Astra166.4

    GPT-6 Astra is 9.2 points higher.

  • Price per 1M tokens

    • Gemini 3.7 Flash$1.50
    • GPT-6 Astra$20.00

    Gemini 3.7 Flash is 13 times cheaper.

  • Context window

    • Gemini 3.7 Flash1M tokens
    • GPT-6 Astra1.1M tokens

    GPT-6 Astra takes in 0% more.

  • Released

    • Gemini 3.7 FlashAug 13, 2026
    • GPT-6 AstraSep 4, 2026

    GPT-6 Astra is 22 days newer.

Where each scores higher

On the 22 tests both have taken, each on its own scale. A gap of a point or two can sit within a test’s margin of error.

Gemini 3.7 Flash

  • Arena text+11 points
  • Arena math+13 points
  • LiveBench agentic coding+1.0 points
  • LiveBench instructions+4.4 points
  • Arena creative writing+44 points
  • Arena instruction following+11 points
  • Arena hard prompts+6 points

GPT-6 Astra

  • LiveBench overall+3.3 points
  • LiveBench coding+1.5 points
  • Arena WebDev+196 points
  • Arena coding+25 points
  • LiveBench mathematics+3.3 points
  • Mock AIME 2024–2025+2.8 points
  • FrontierMath Tiers 1–3+22.1 points
  • FrontierMath Tier 4+61.0 points
  • SimpleQA Verified+6.4 points
  • DeepSWE+8.6 points
  • LiveBench language+4.0 points
  • LiveBench data analysis+15.0 points
  • LiveBench reasoning+4.9 points
  • GPQA Diamond+1.0 points
  • Chess puzzles+25.0 points

Everything side by side

Comparison of Gemini 3.7 Flash vs GPT-6 Astra
MeasureGemini 3.7 FlashGoogleGPT-6 AstraOpenAI
Model
MakerGoogleOpenAI
Sold here byGoogleOpenAI
API model IDgemini-3.7-flashgpt-6-astra
ReleasedAug 13, 2026Sep 4, 2026
Knowledge cutoffMar 2026Apr 30, 2026
WeightsClosed: hosted access onlyClosed: hosted access only
Developer’s countryUnited StatesUnited States
Hosts selling it29including Google directly29including OpenAI directly
Training computeNot published1.0 × 10²⁷ FLOPEpoch AI estimate
Test results
Capability index157.3#16 of 274166.4 (best of these models)#2 of 274
LiveBench overall78.8%#16 of 6682.2% (best of these models)#4 of 66
Arena text1488 (best of these models)#17 of 4131477#29 of 413
LiveBench coding78.9%#29 of 6680.4% (best of these models)#20 of 66
Arena WebDev1592#27 of 1381788 (best of these models)#2 of 138
Arena coding1518#41 of 4081543 (best of these models)#7 of 408
LiveBench mathematics93.5%#20 of 6696.8% (best of these models)#4 of 66
Mock AIME 2024–202597.2%#31 of 297100.0% (best of these models)#1 of 297
FrontierMath Tiers 1–371.6%#23 of 11493.7% (best of these models)#1 of 114
FrontierMath Tier 436.6%#30 of 7097.6% (best of these models)#2 of 70
Arena math1503 (best of these models)#12 of 3961490#27 of 396
SimpleQA Verified69.2%#9 of 8675.6% (best of these models)#1 of 86
LiveBench agentic coding58.3% (best of these models)#19 of 6657.3%#21 of 66
DeepSWE65.5%#25 of 6974.1% (best of these models)#1 of 69
LiveBench language85.5%#13 of 6689.4% (best of these models)#4 of 66
LiveBench instructions79.9% (best of these models)#2 of 6675.6%#8 of 66
Arena creative writing1493 (best of these models)#5 of 4111449#39 of 411
Arena instruction following1485 (best of these models)#17 of 4131474#30 of 413
LiveBench data analysis68.0%#55 of 6683.0% (best of these models)#1 of 66
LiveBench reasoning87.8%#25 of 6692.7% (best of these models)#1 of 66
GPQA Diamond94.8%#5 of 31995.8% (best of these models)#1 of 319
Chess puzzles47.0%#14 of 22772.0% (best of these models)#1 of 227
Arena hard prompts1508 (best of these models)#19 of 4131502#30 of 413
Price per million tokens
Input$0.75 (best of these models)$10.00
Output$3.75 (best of these models)$50.00
Blended, 3 input to 1 output$1.50 (best of these models)$20.00
Cached input$0.075 (best of these models)$1.00
Writing to the cacheNot reported$12.50
Audio input$0.75Not reported
Long requestsNo separate price reported$20.00 in, $75.00 outabove 272K tokens
The maker’s own priceThis listingThis listing
Limits
Context window1M tokens1.1M tokens (best of these models)
Max input936K tokens (best of these models)922K tokens
Max output65.5K tokens128K tokens (best of these models)
Features
Readsaudio, images, PDFs, text and videoimages, PDFs and text
Producestexttext
ReasoningYeseffort low, medium, highYeseffort low, medium, high, xhigh, max
Tool callingYesYes
Structured outputYes, such as JSONYes, such as JSON
File attachmentsYesYes
Temperature settingSupportedFixed by the provider

Bold marks the better value in each row. Prices are each model’s own list price, or the middle price across hosts when the maker does not sell it, blended as three input tokens for every output token. Test results as published by LiveBench (Apache-2.0), Epoch AI (CC BY 4.0), Datacurve DeepSWE, compiled by Epoch AI (CC BY 4.0), Arena (CC BY 4.0); model details and prices from models.dev (MIT). Confirm pricing with the provider before use.