The best AI image models, ranked by people.
Arena shows people two images made from the same prompt, without naming the models, and asks which is better. Millions of those votes decide these rankings.
At a glance
What people’s votes say about today’s image models.
- Leader
GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst leads text to image at 1425, 28 points ahead of GPT Image 2.5 Flare. Their 95% ranges do not overlap: a clear lead.
- Open weights
The best open-weights model,
Qwen Image 2.1 (Qwen Research License), ranks #18 at 1223, 202 points behind the leader.
- Categories
GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst also leads all 7 categories.
- New
New on the board in the last month: GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst, GPT Image 2.5 Flare, Grok Imagine Image 2.0 (Canvas), MAI Image 2.6, Grok Imagine Image 2.0 (20260801), Qwen Image 2.1 and Recraft V4.1 Flash.
- Editing
GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst leads image editing at 1524, out of 58 models.
Text to image
81 models, ranked by blind votes on the same prompt.
Text to image: overall
Arena score, higher is better. Pick a kind of image, or show only models with downloadable weights.
- Rank 1
GPT Image 2.5 SunburstOpenAI, 16,652 votesNewArena score 142595% range 1418 to 1432
- Rank 2
GPT Image 2.5 FlareOpenAI, 15,792 votesNewArena score 139795% range 1390 to 1404
- Rank 3
GPT Image 2 (medium)OpenAI, 92,549 votesArena score 138495% range 1379 to 1388
- Rank 4
Grok Imagine Image 2.0 (Canvas)xAI, 3,070 votesNewArena score 133695% range 1324 to 1347
- Rank 5
MAI Image 2.6Microsoft AI, 23,918 votesNewArena score 133395% range 1328 to 1339
- Rank 6
Reve 2.1Reve, 8,250 votesArena score 130295% range 1294 to 1310
- Rank 7
Grok Imagine Image 2.0 (20260801)xAI, 13,278 votesNewArena score 129795% range 1290 to 1303
- Rank 8
Muse ImageMeta, 41,071 votesArena score 127495% range 1269 to 1279
- Rank 9
Reve 2.0Reve, 15,774 votesArena score 126995% range 1263 to 1275
- Rank 10
Gemini 3.1 Flash Image (Nano Banana 2), web searchGoogle, 59,301 votesArena score 126195% range 1257 to 1265
- Rank 11
Seedream 5.0 ProByteDance, 93,111 votesArena score 125695% range 1252 to 1260
- Rank 12
Qwen Image 3.0 ProAlibaba, 11,443 votesArena score 125595% range 1249 to 1262
- Rank 13
MAI Image 2.5Microsoft AI, 61,268 votesArena score 125495% range 1250 to 1259
- Rank 14
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image (Nano Banana 2 Lite)Google, 17,808 votesArena score 125095% range 1244 to 1256
- Rank 15
Gemini 3 Pro Image 2K (Nano Banana Pro)Google, 174,535 votesArena score 124895% range 1245 to 1251
- Rank 16
GPT Image 1.5 High FidelityOpenAI, 169,194 votesArena score 123895% range 1235 to 1241
- Rank 17
Gemini 3 Pro Image Preview (Nano Banana Pro)Google, 86,464 votesArena score 123495% range 1229 to 1239
- Rank 18
Qwen Image 2.1Alibaba, 10,231 votesOpen weightsNewArena score 122395% range 1216 to 1229
- Rank 19
Ideogram 4.0 QualityIdeogram, 59,356 votesOpen weightsArena score 120595% range 1201 to 1209
- Rank 20
Qwen Image 2.0 Pro (2026-06-22)Alibaba, 13,099 votesArena score 119295% range 1186 to 1198
Dots mark each model’s Arena score; the line is its 95% range. Where two ranges overlap, the order between those models is not settled. Arena (CC BY 4.0).
The best model for each kind of image
The top model from each of the three leading makers, with its rank, from the votes on prompts of that kind.
Overall
- Rank 1
GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst1425
- Rank 4
Grok Imagine Image 2.0 (Canvas)1336
- Rank 5
MAI Image 2.61333
Photorealistic
- Rank 1
GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst1430
- Rank 4
MAI Image 2.61331
- Rank 5
Grok Imagine Image 2.0 (Canvas)1327
Portraits
- Rank 1
GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst1467
- Rank 4
Grok Imagine Image 2.0 (Canvas)1358
- Rank 5
MAI Image 2.61347
Art
- Rank 1
GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst1395
- Rank 4
Grok Imagine Image 2.0 (Canvas)1339
- Rank 5
MAI Image 2.61336
Cartoon
- Rank 1
GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst1445
- Rank 4
Grok Imagine Image 2.0 (Canvas)1373
- Rank 5
MAI Image 2.61350
3D modeling
- Rank 1
GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst1414
- Rank 4
MAI Image 2.61327
- Rank 5
Grok Imagine Image 2.0 (Canvas)1322
Commercial design
- Rank 1
GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst1420
- Rank 4
Grok Imagine Image 2.0 (Canvas)1348
- Rank 5
MAI Image 2.61340
Text in images
- Rank 1
GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst1471
- Rank 4
MAI Image 2.61371
- Rank 5
Grok Imagine Image 2.0 (Canvas)1357
Makers
Where each company’s best image model stands.
Each maker’s best text-to-image model
The highest-scoring model from each of the 12 leading makers.
OpenAIGPT Image 2.5 SunburstArena score 142595% range 1418 to 1432
xAIGrok Imagine Image 2.0 (Canvas)Arena score 133695% range 1324 to 1347
Microsoft AIMAI Image 2.6Arena score 133395% range 1328 to 1339
ReveReve 2.1Arena score 130295% range 1294 to 1310
MetaMuse ImageArena score 127495% range 1269 to 1279
GoogleGemini 3.1 Flash Image (Nano Banana 2), web searchArena score 126195% range 1257 to 1265
ByteDanceSeedream 5.0 ProArena score 125695% range 1252 to 1260
AlibabaQwen Image 3.0 ProArena score 125595% range 1249 to 1262
IdeogramIdeogram 4.0 QualityArena score 120595% range 1201 to 1209
Luma AIUNI 1.1 MaxArena score 118995% range 1183 to 1196
RecraftRecraft V4.1 Utility ProArena score 116995% range 1158 to 1180
NVIDIACosmos3-Super-Text2Image (Agentic)Arena score 116595% range 1158 to 1172
Dots mark the Arena score; the line is its 95% range. Arena (CC BY 4.0).
Progress
How the leading makers’ best scores have moved, month by month.
Best text-to-image score, by maker
Each point is a maker’s best model at the end of a month. Select a maker in the legend to hide or show it.
Arena score. Use the arrow keys to move between points.
| Series | Date | Model | Arena score |
|---|---|---|---|
| OpenAI | Jan 28, 2025 | DALL·E 3 | 978 |
| OpenAI | Feb 27, 2025 | DALL·E 3 | 978 |
| OpenAI | Mar 30, 2025 | DALL·E 3 | 978 |
| OpenAI | Apr 23, 2025 | DALL·E 3 | 978 |
| OpenAI | May 22, 2025 | DALL·E 3 | 978 |
| OpenAI | Jun 24, 2025 | GPT Image 1 | 1135 |
| OpenAI | Jul 28, 2025 | GPT Image 1 | 1137 |
| OpenAI | Aug 28, 2025 | GPT Image 1 | 1124 |
| OpenAI | Sep 30, 2025 | GPT Image 1 | 1127 |
| OpenAI | Oct 17, 2025 | GPT Image 1 | 1124 |
| OpenAI | Nov 21, 2025 | GPT Image 1 | 1122 |
| OpenAI | Dec 16, 2025 | GPT Image 1.5 High Fidelity | 1264 |
| OpenAI | Jan 29, 2026 | GPT Image 1.5 High Fidelity | 1236 |
| OpenAI | Feb 26, 2026 | GPT Image 1.5 High Fidelity | 1248 |
| OpenAI | Mar 26, 2026 | GPT Image 1.5 High Fidelity | 1244 |
| OpenAI | Apr 23, 2026 | GPT Image 2 (medium) | 1508 |
| OpenAI | May 26, 2026 | GPT Image 2 (medium) | 1388 |
| OpenAI | Jun 30, 2026 | GPT Image 2 (medium) | 1387 |
| OpenAI | Jul 10, 2026 | GPT Image 2 (medium) | 1385 |
| OpenAI | Aug 7, 2026 | GPT Image 2 (medium) | 1381 |
| OpenAI | Sep 24, 2026 | GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst | 1424 |
| OpenAI | Oct 5, 2026 | GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst | 1425 |
| xAI | Jan 29, 2026 | Grok Imagine Image Pro | 1166 |
| xAI | Mar 26, 2026 | Grok Imagine Image | 1173 |
| xAI | Apr 23, 2026 | Grok Imagine Image | 1170 |
| xAI | May 26, 2026 | Grok Imagine Image Quality | 1228 |
| xAI | Jun 30, 2026 | Grok Imagine Image Quality | 1231 |
| xAI | Jul 10, 2026 | Grok Imagine Image Quality | 1229 |
| xAI | Aug 7, 2026 | Grok Imagine Image Quality | 1228 |
| xAI | Sep 24, 2026 | Grok Imagine Image 2.0 (low) | 1301 |
| xAI | Oct 5, 2026 | Grok Imagine Image 2.0 (Canvas) | 1336 |
| Microsoft AI | Oct 17, 2025 | MAI Image 1 | 1090 |
| Microsoft AI | Nov 21, 2025 | MAI Image 1 | 1090 |
| Microsoft AI | Dec 16, 2025 | MAI Image 1 | 1092 |
| Microsoft AI | Jan 29, 2026 | MAI Image 1 | 1095 |
| Microsoft AI | Feb 26, 2026 | MAI Image 1 | 1094 |
| Microsoft AI | Mar 26, 2026 | MAI Image 2 | 1190 |
| Microsoft AI | Apr 23, 2026 | MAI Image 2 | 1183 |
| Microsoft AI | May 26, 2026 | MAI Image 2.5 Preview | 1254 |
| Microsoft AI | Jun 30, 2026 | MAI Image 2.5 | 1257 |
| Microsoft AI | Jul 10, 2026 | MAI Image 2.5 | 1257 |
| Microsoft AI | Aug 7, 2026 | MAI Image 2.5 | 1256 |
| Microsoft AI | Sep 24, 2026 | MAI Image 2.6 | 1335 |
| Microsoft AI | Oct 5, 2026 | MAI Image 2.6 | 1333 |
| Reve | Feb 26, 2026 | Reve V1.5 | 1178 |
| Reve | Mar 26, 2026 | Reve V1.5 | 1177 |
| Reve | Apr 23, 2026 | Reve V1.5 | 1177 |
| Reve | May 26, 2026 | Reve V1.5 | 1156 |
| Reve | Jun 30, 2026 | Reve 2.0 | 1273 |
| Reve | Jul 10, 2026 | Reve 2.1 | 1302 |
| Reve | Aug 7, 2026 | Reve 2.1 | 1302 |
| Reve | Sep 24, 2026 | Reve 2.1 | 1302 |
| Reve | Oct 5, 2026 | Reve 2.1 | 1302 |
| Meta | Jul 10, 2026 | Muse Image | 1280 |
| Meta | Aug 7, 2026 | Muse Image | 1283 |
| Meta | Sep 24, 2026 | Muse Image | 1276 |
| Meta | Oct 5, 2026 | Muse Image | 1274 |
| Jan 28, 2025 | Imagen 3.0 (002) | 1105 | |
| Feb 27, 2025 | Imagen 3.0 (002) | 1090 | |
| Mar 30, 2025 | Imagen 3.0 (002) | 1088 | |
| Apr 23, 2025 | Imagen 3.0 (002) | 1086 | |
| May 22, 2025 | Imagen 3.0 (002) | 1084 | |
| Jun 24, 2025 | Imagen 3.0 (002) | 1081 | |
| Jul 28, 2025 | Imagen Ultra 4.0 (001) | 1114 | |
| Aug 28, 2025 | Gemini 2.5 Flash Image Preview (Nano Banana) | 1145 | |
| Sep 30, 2025 | Gemini 2.5 Flash Image Preview (Nano Banana) | 1150 | |
| Oct 17, 2025 | Gemini 2.5 Flash Image Preview (Nano Banana) | 1153 | |
| Nov 21, 2025 | Gemini 3 Pro Image Preview (Nano Banana Pro) | 1242 | |
| Dec 16, 2025 | Gemini 3 Pro Image Preview 2K (Nano Banana Pro) | 1235 | |
| Jan 29, 2026 | Gemini 3 Pro Image Preview 2K (Nano Banana Pro) | 1228 | |
| Feb 26, 2026 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview (Nano Banana 2), web search | 1280 | |
| Mar 26, 2026 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview (Nano Banana 2), web search | 1266 | |
| Apr 23, 2026 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview (Nano Banana 2), web search | 1271 | |
| May 26, 2026 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview (Nano Banana 2), web search | 1271 | |
| Jun 30, 2026 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview (Nano Banana 2), web search | 1270 | |
| Jul 10, 2026 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Image (Nano Banana 2), web search | 1261 | |
| Aug 7, 2026 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Image (Nano Banana 2), web search | 1263 | |
| Sep 24, 2026 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Image (Nano Banana 2), web search | 1261 | |
| Oct 5, 2026 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Image (Nano Banana 2), web search | 1261 |
Arena recomputes every score at each publication, and the scale shifts as models join, so read the lines for who led and when more than for exact gains. Arena (CC BY 4.0).
Image editing
58 models changing a picture on instruction, ranked the same way.
Image editing: overall
Arena score for edits of the same image and instruction, higher is better.
- Rank 1
GPT Image 2.5 SunburstOpenAI, 58,172 votesNewArena score 152495% range 1518 to 1529
- Rank 2
GPT Image 2.5 FlareOpenAI, 55,745 votesNewArena score 148195% range 1476 to 1486
- Rank 3
GPT Image 2 (medium)OpenAI, 304,260 votesArena score 146295% range 1459 to 1465
- Rank 4
Grok Imagine Image 2.0 (Canvas)xAI, 10,821 votesNewArena score 143895% range 1429 to 1447
- Rank 5
MAI Image 2.6Microsoft AI, 50,147 votesNewArena score 142795% range 1422 to 1432
- Rank 6
Grok Imagine Image 2.0 (20260801)xAI, 48,559 votesNewArena score 142695% range 1420 to 1431
- Rank 7
Muse ImageMeta, 141,017 votesArena score 140395% range 1398 to 1407
- Rank 8
MAI Image 2.5Microsoft AI, 190,078 votesArena score 140195% range 1397 to 1405
- Rank 9
Seedream 5.0 ProByteDance, 281,170 votesArena score 139495% range 1391 to 1397
- Rank 10
Grok Imagine Image Quality (20260519)xAI, 38,195 votesArena score 139195% range 1386 to 1397
- Rank 11
Gemini 3 Pro Image 2K (Nano Banana Pro)Google, 649,919 votesArena score 139095% range 1387 to 1393
- Rank 12
ChatGPT Image Latest High Fidelity (20251216)OpenAI, 627,869 votesArena score 138995% range 1386 to 1391
- Rank 13
Gemini 3.1 Flash Image (Nano Banana 2), web searchGoogle, 228,014 votesArena score 138795% range 1384 to 1390
- Rank 14
Gemini 3 Pro Image Preview (Nano Banana Pro)Google, 540,775 votesArena score 138695% range 1383 to 1389
- Rank 15
Reve 2.1Reve, 20,794 votesArena score 137495% range 1368 to 1380
- Rank 16
GPT Image 1.5 High FidelityOpenAI, 652,679 votesArena score 137095% range 1367 to 1372
- Rank 17
Qwen Image 2.1Alibaba, 21,114 votesOpen weightsNewArena score 136995% range 1363 to 1374
- Rank 18
Reve 2.0Reve, 19,263 votesArena score 135995% range 1352 to 1365
- Rank 19
Ideogram 4.5Ideogram, 17,351 votesNewArena score 134795% range 1342 to 1353
- Rank 20
UNI 1.1 MaxLuma AI, 43,441 votesArena score 133495% range 1329 to 1339
Dots mark each model’s Arena score; the line is its 95% range. Where two ranges overlap, the order between those models is not settled. Arena (CC BY 4.0).
An automated test
Votes measure what people prefer. T2I-CoReBench checks something else: whether a model draws exactly what a complex prompt asks for.
Frequently asked questions
Answered from the data on this page.
Which is the best AI image generator?
On Arena’s text-to-image board, GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst scores highest at 1425, from 16,652 votes, ahead of GPT Image 2.5 Flare (1397) and GPT Image 2 (medium) (1384). The best model for your work can differ by category, such as photos, portraits or text in images.
What is the best open-weights image model?
Qwen Image 2.1 ranks highest among models with downloadable weights, #18 overall at 1223, under the Qwen Research License. Next is Ideogram 4.0 Quality at #19. Check each licence: several allow only non-commercial use.
Which AI makes the most realistic photos?
GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst leads Arena’s photorealistic category at 1430. Categories use only the votes on prompts of that kind.
Which AI is best at putting text in images?
GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst leads Arena’s text in images category at 1471. Categories use only the votes on prompts of that kind.
Which AI is best for portraits?
GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst leads Arena’s portraits category at 1467. Categories use only the votes on prompts of that kind.
Which AI is best at editing images?
GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst leads Arena’s image-editing board at 1524, ahead of GPT Image 2.5 Flare (1481). People compare two edits of the same image and instruction.
How are the image models ranked?
Arena shows a visitor two images made from the same prompt by two anonymous models and asks which is better. Only after voting are the models named. Millions of these votes give each model a score, on a scale like chess ratings: a higher score wins more often. The 95% range shows how sure the score is; where two ranges overlap, their order is not settled.
Does Artificials run these votes?
No. The votes and scores come from Arena’s published leaderboard dataset. Artificials tidies the model names, matches models to their makers and builds the charts, category summaries and progress lines from that data.
Sources and method
Artificials does not run these votes or tests. Scores, ranges, votes and licences come from the sources below; Artificials tidies the model names for reading, matches each model to its maker, and builds the category summaries, maker comparison and progress lines. Categories that cover fewer than twenty models are left out.