Compare models
HEAD TO HEAD

GLM-5.3 vs GPT-6 Astra

Published test results, prices, limits and features, side by side. Share the link to show someone exactly this comparison.

At a glance

  • Capability index

    • GLM-5.3155.6
    • GPT-6 Astra166.4

    GPT-6 Astra is 10.8 points higher.

  • Price per 1M tokens

    • GLM-5.3$2.15
    • GPT-6 Astra$20.00

    GLM-5.3 is 9.3 times cheaper.

  • Context window

    • GLM-5.31M tokens
    • GPT-6 Astra1.1M tokens

    GPT-6 Astra takes in 5% more.

  • Released

    • GLM-5.3Aug 14, 2026
    • GPT-6 AstraSep 4, 2026

    GPT-6 Astra is 21 days newer.

Where each scores higher

On the 22 tests both have taken, each on its own scale. A gap of a point or two can sit within a test’s margin of error.

GLM-5.3

  • Arena text+1 points
  • Arena math+4 points
  • LiveBench agentic coding+3.6 points
  • Arena creative writing+5 points
  • Arena instruction following+2 points
  • Arena hard prompts+2 points

GPT-6 Astra

  • LiveBench overall+6.0 points
  • LiveBench coding+1.4 points
  • Arena WebDev+165 points
  • Arena coding+23 points
  • LiveBench mathematics+8.9 points
  • Mock AIME 2024–2025+8.9 points
  • FrontierMath Tiers 1–3+24.9 points
  • FrontierMath Tier 4+68.3 points
  • SimpleQA Verified+34.6 points
  • DeepSWE+5.2 points
  • LiveBench language+9.6 points
  • LiveBench instructions+6.3 points
  • LiveBench data analysis+12.7 points
  • LiveBench reasoning+6.9 points
  • GPQA Diamond+4.9 points
  • Chess puzzles+51.0 points

1 more test has results for only one of them; the table below lists every result.

Everything side by side

Comparison of GLM-5.3 vs GPT-6 Astra
MeasureGLM-5.3Z.aiGPT-6 AstraOpenAI
Model
MakerZ.aiOpenAI
Sold here byZ.AIOpenAI
API model IDglm-5.3gpt-6-astra
ReleasedAug 14, 2026Sep 4, 2026
Knowledge cutoffNot reportedApr 30, 2026
WeightsOpen: downloadableClosed: hosted access only
Developer’s countryChinaUnited States
Hosts selling it75including Z.ai directly29including OpenAI directly
Training computeNot published1.0 × 10²⁷ FLOPEpoch AI estimate
Test results
Capability index155.6#27 of 274166.4 (best of these models)#2 of 274
LiveBench overall76.1%#32 of 6682.2% (best of these models)#4 of 66
Arena text1479 (best of these models)#27 of 4131477#29 of 413
LiveBench coding79.0%#26 of 6680.4% (best of these models)#20 of 66
Arena WebDev1623#20 of 1381788 (best of these models)#2 of 138
Arena coding1521#34 of 4081543 (best of these models)#7 of 408
LiveBench mathematics87.9%#43 of 6696.8% (best of these models)#4 of 66
Mock AIME 2024–202591.1%#65 of 297100.0% (best of these models)#1 of 297
FrontierMath Tiers 1–368.8%#25 of 11493.7% (best of these models)#1 of 114
FrontierMath Tier 429.3%#36 of 7097.6% (best of these models)#2 of 70
Arena math1494 (best of these models)#20 of 3961490#27 of 396
SimpleQA Verified41.0%#44 of 8675.6% (best of these models)#1 of 86
LiveBench agentic coding60.9% (best of these models)#15 of 6657.3%#21 of 66
DeepSWE69.0%#16 of 6974.1% (best of these models)#1 of 69
CursorBench42.6%#20 of 62Not tested
LiveBench language79.9%#31 of 6689.4% (best of these models)#4 of 66
LiveBench instructions69.3%#33 of 6675.6% (best of these models)#8 of 66
Arena creative writing1454 (best of these models)#34 of 4111449#39 of 411
Arena instruction following1476 (best of these models)#25 of 4131474#30 of 413
LiveBench data analysis70.2%#51 of 6683.0% (best of these models)#1 of 66
LiveBench reasoning85.8%#35 of 6692.7% (best of these models)#1 of 66
GPQA Diamond90.9%#34 of 31995.8% (best of these models)#1 of 319
Chess puzzles21.0%#80 of 22772.0% (best of these models)#1 of 227
Arena hard prompts1503 (best of these models)#25 of 4131502#30 of 413
Price per million tokens
Input$1.40 (best of these models)$10.00
Output$4.40 (best of these models)$50.00
Blended, 3 input to 1 output$2.15 (best of these models)$20.00
Cached input$0.26 (best of these models)$1.00
Writing to the cacheFree (best of these models)$12.50
Long requestsNo separate price reported$20.00 in, $75.00 outabove 272K tokens
The maker’s own priceThis listingThis listing
Limits
Context window1M tokens1.1M tokens (best of these models)
Max input1M tokens (best of these models)922K tokens
Max output131.1K tokens (best of these models)128K tokens
Features
Readstextimages, PDFs and text
Producestexttext
ReasoningYeseffort low, high, max; can be switched off; thinking budget can be setYeseffort low, medium, high, xhigh, max
Tool callingYesYes
Structured outputYes, such as JSONYes, such as JSON
File attachmentsNoYes
Temperature settingSupportedFixed by the provider

Bold marks the better value in each row. Prices are each model’s own list price, or the middle price across hosts when the maker does not sell it, blended as three input tokens for every output token. Test results as published by LiveBench (Apache-2.0), Epoch AI (CC BY 4.0), Datacurve DeepSWE, compiled by Epoch AI (CC BY 4.0), Cursor CursorBench, compiled by Epoch AI (CC BY 4.0), Arena (CC BY 4.0); model details and prices from models.dev (MIT). Confirm pricing with the provider before use.