GLM-5.3 vs Kimi K3
Published test results, prices, limits and features, side by side. Share the link to show someone exactly this comparison.
At a glance
Capability index
GLM-5.3155.6
Kimi K3157.4
Kimi K3 is 1.8 points higher.
Price per 1M tokens
GLM-5.3$2.15
Kimi K3$6.00
GLM-5.3 is 2.8 times cheaper.
Context window
GLM-5.31M tokens
Kimi K31M tokens
They take in about the same.
Released
GLM-5.3Aug 14, 2026
Kimi K3Jul 16, 2026
GLM-5.3 is 29 days newer.
Where each scores higher
On the 22 tests both have taken, each on its own scale. A gap of a point or two can sit within a test’s margin of error.
GLM-5.3
- LiveBench mathematics+3.5 points
- DeepSWE+0.4 points
Kimi K3
- LiveBench overall+3.0 points
- Arena text+10 points
- LiveBench coding+2.5 points
- Arena WebDev+35 points
- Arena coding+20 points
- Mock AIME 2024–2025+6.1 points
- FrontierMath Tiers 1–3+3.4 points
- FrontierMath Tier 4+9.8 points
- Arena math+6 points
- SimpleQA Verified+9.6 points
- LiveBench agentic coding+1.3 points
- LiveBench language+5.7 points
- LiveBench instructions+2.1 points
- Arena creative writing+6 points
- Arena instruction following+12 points
- LiveBench data analysis+8.5 points
- LiveBench reasoning+4.9 points
- GPQA Diamond+2.2 points
- Chess puzzles+18.0 points
- Arena hard prompts+14 points
1 more test has results for only one of them; the table below lists every result.
Everything side by side
| Measure | ||
|---|---|---|
| Model | ||
| Maker | Z.ai | Moonshot AI |
| Sold here by | Z.AI | Moonshot AI |
| API model ID | glm-5.3 | kimi-k3 |
| Released | Aug 14, 2026 | Jul 16, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Not reported | Not reported |
| Weights | Open: downloadable | Open: downloadable |
| Developer’s country | China | China |
| Hosts selling it | 75including Z.ai directly | 84including Moonshot AI directly |
| Training compute | Not published | 2.0 × 10²⁵ FLOPEpoch AI estimate |
| Test results | ||
| Capability index | 155.6#27 of 274 | 157.4 (best of these models)#15 of 274 |
| LiveBench overall | 76.1%#32 of 66 | 79.2% (best of these models)#15 of 66 |
| Arena text | 1479#27 of 413 | 1488 (best of these models)#16 of 413 |
| LiveBench coding | 79.0%#26 of 66 | 81.5% (best of these models)#15 of 66 |
| Arena WebDev | 1623#20 of 138 | 1658 (best of these models)#13 of 138 |
| Arena coding | 1521#34 of 408 | 1541 (best of these models)#9 of 408 |
| LiveBench mathematics | 87.9% (best of these models)#43 of 66 | 84.4%#53 of 66 |
| Mock AIME 2024–2025 | 91.1%#65 of 297 | 97.2% (best of these models)#31 of 297 |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1–3 | 68.8%#25 of 114 | 72.2% (best of these models)#22 of 114 |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 29.3%#36 of 70 | 39.0% (best of these models)#29 of 70 |
| Arena math | 1494#20 of 396 | 1501 (best of these models)#16 of 396 |
| SimpleQA Verified | 41.0%#44 of 86 | 50.6% (best of these models)#24 of 86 |
| LiveBench agentic coding | 60.9%#15 of 66 | 62.2% (best of these models)#10 of 66 |
| DeepSWE | 69.0% (best of these models)#16 of 69 | 68.5%#19 of 69 |
| CursorBench | 42.6%#20 of 62 | Not tested |
| LiveBench language | 79.9%#31 of 66 | 85.5% (best of these models)#11 of 66 |
| LiveBench instructions | 69.3%#33 of 66 | 71.4% (best of these models)#23 of 66 |
| Arena creative writing | 1454#34 of 411 | 1460 (best of these models)#26 of 411 |
| Arena instruction following | 1476#25 of 413 | 1488 (best of these models)#14 of 413 |
| LiveBench data analysis | 70.2%#51 of 66 | 78.7% (best of these models)#21 of 66 |
| LiveBench reasoning | 85.8%#35 of 66 | 90.7% (best of these models)#9 of 66 |
| GPQA Diamond | 90.9%#34 of 319 | 93.1% (best of these models)#20 of 319 |
| Chess puzzles | 21.0%#80 of 227 | 39.0% (best of these models)#31 of 227 |
| Arena hard prompts | 1503#25 of 413 | 1517 (best of these models)#9 of 413 |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $1.40 (best of these models) | $3.00 |
| Output | $4.40 (best of these models) | $15.00 |
| Blended, 3 input to 1 output | $2.15 (best of these models) | $6.00 |
| Cached input | $0.26 (best of these models) | $0.30 |
| Writing to the cache | Free | Not reported |
| The maker’s own price | This listing | This listing |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 1M tokens | 1M tokens |
| Max input | 1M tokens | 1M tokens |
| Max output | 131.1K tokens | 1M tokens (best of these models) |
| Features | ||
| Reads | text | images, text and video |
| Produces | text | text |
| Reasoning | Yeseffort low, high, max; can be switched off; thinking budget can be set | Yeseffort low, high, max; can be switched off; thinking budget can be set |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes, such as JSON | Yes, such as JSON |
| File attachments | No | Yes |
| Temperature setting | Supported | Fixed by the provider |
Bold marks the better value in each row. Prices are each model’s own list price, or the middle price across hosts when the maker does not sell it, blended as three input tokens for every output token. Test results as published by LiveBench (Apache-2.0), Epoch AI (CC BY 4.0), Datacurve DeepSWE, compiled by Epoch AI (CC BY 4.0), Cursor CursorBench, compiled by Epoch AI (CC BY 4.0), Arena (CC BY 4.0); model details and prices from models.dev (MIT). Confirm pricing with the provider before use.